What was the main issue at the center of the Marrow Controversy in Scottish Presbyterianism?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Chapell and Meeks Licensure and Ordination Test. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations for better understanding. Achieve readiness for your ordination journey.

The main issue at the center of the Marrow Controversy in Scottish Presbyterianism was the relationship between law and gospel in salvation. This controversy arose in the early 18th century when a group of theologians sought to clarify how the law of God and the gospel of grace interact in the process of salvation. The "Marrow" writers emphasized that salvation is purely by grace through faith and that the law serves a different purpose, primarily highlighting human sinfulness and the need for grace rather than functioning as a means to achieve salvation.

This perspective sparked significant debate within Presbyterian circles, leading to a split in understanding how individuals are justified before God. The conflict revolved around whether the law should be seen as something that can contribute to salvation or if it is wholly separate from the gospel's promise of grace. The Marrow controversy ultimately influenced various theological developments within Scottish Presbyterianism, particularly concerning assurance and the nature of faith.

In contrast, the other topics referenced, such as the proper administration of communion, the roles of ministers versus laypeople, and principles of church governance, while significant in their own rights, did not form the central issue of the Marrow Controversy. The focus on law and gospel had profound implications for soteriology (the

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy