What is the "Satisfaction Theory of Atonement" associated with?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Chapell and Meeks Licensure and Ordination Test. Use flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations for better understanding. Achieve readiness for your ordination journey.

The "Satisfaction Theory of Atonement" is most closely associated with Anselm of Canterbury. This theory posits that sin has disrupted the order of justice in the universe, and thus a recompense is necessary to restore this order. Anselm argued that God's honor had been offended by humanity’s sin, creating a need for satisfaction to balance the scales of justice. In his work "Cur Deus Homo" (Why God Became Man), he explains that Christ’s sacrificial death provides the requisite satisfaction by meeting both God’s justice and mercy. This understanding presents a framework where Christ's sacrifice not only atones for sin but also upholds God's justice, which is a central tenet of Anselm’s theological perspective.

The other figures mentioned have differing views on atonement. For instance, Augustine of Hippo's views emphasize grace and human will in relation to salvation. Thomas Aquinas built on Augustine's thoughts and integrated Aristotelian philosophy into the discussion of sin and salvation but did not specifically champion the Satisfaction Theory as Anselm did. Bernard of Clairvaux, known for his focus on love and the experience of God, approached atonement from a mystical and affectionate standpoint rather than a juridical one like An

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy