How does the Reformed view differ from the Arminian view in terms of predestination?

The Reformed view of predestination emphasizes that election is grounded in God's good pleasure and sovereign will. This means that God, in His sovereignty, chooses individuals for salvation not based on any foreseen merits or actions but rather according to His own purposes and desires. This reflects a core belief in the sovereignty of God over all aspects of salvation, including who is elected to receive grace.

In contrast, the Arminian view posits that God's choice of individuals for salvation is influenced by His foresight of their faith and actions. While Arminians affirm the significance of divine grace, they maintain that human free will plays a crucial role in the process of election, making the relationship between God's sovereignty and human decision-making a focal point of their theology.

This distinction underscores the Reformed interpretation wherein God's choice is ultimately unconditional and not contingent upon any human response, aligning with the belief that salvation is entirely an act of God's grace. Thus, the Reformed perspective on predestination sees it firmly rooted in God's own intentions rather than human decisions or actions.